This post will resolve this confusion and explain what Apache Hive and Impala are and what makes them different from one another!
Apache Hive
Apache Hive is a SQL data access interface for the Apache Hadoop platform. Hive allows you to query, aggregate, and analyze data using SQL syntax. A read access scheme is used for data in the HDFS file system, allowing you to treat data as with an ordinary table or relational DBMS. HiveQL queries are translated into Java code for MapReduce jobs. Hive queries are written in the HiveQL query language, which is based on the SQL language but does not have full support for the SQL-92 standard. However, this language allows programmers to use their queries when it is inconvenient or inefficient to use HiveQL features. HiveQL can be extended with user-defined scalar functions (UDFs), aggregations (UDAF codes), and table functions (UDTFs).
How does Apache Hive work
Apache Hive translates programs written in HiveQL language (close to SQL) into one or more MapReduce, Apache Tez, or Apache Spark tasks. These are three execution engines that can be launched on Hadoop. Then, Apache Hive organizes the data into an array for the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) file to run the jobs on a cluster to produce a response. Apache Hive tables are similar to relational databases, and data units are organized from the most significant unit to the most granular. Databases are arrays composed of partitions, which can again be broken down into “buckets.” The data is accessible via HiveQL. Within each database, the data is numbered, and each table corresponds to an HDFS directory. Multiple interfaces are available within the Apache Hive architecture, such as web interface, CLI, or external clients. Indeed, the “Apache Hive Thrift” server allows remote clients to submit commands and requests to Apache Hive using various programming languages. Apache Hive’s central directory is a “metastore” containing all the information. The engine that makes Hive work is called “the driver.” It bundles a compiler and an optimizer to determine the optimal execution plan. Finally, security is provided by Hadoop. It, therefore, relies on Kerberos for mutual authentication between the client and server. The permission for newly created files in Apache Hive is dictated by HDFS, allowing user, group, or otherwise authorization.
Features of Hive
Supports the computing engine of both Hadoop and Spark Uses HDFS and works as a data warehouse. Uses MapReduce and supports ETL Due to HDFS, it has fault tolerance similar to Hadoop
Apache Hive: Benefits
Apache Hive is an ideal solution for queries and data analysis. It makes it possible to obtain qualitative insights, providing a competitive advantage and facilitating responsiveness to market demand. Among the main advantages of Apache Hive, we can mention the ease of use linked to its “SQL-friendly” language. In addition, it speeds up the initial insertion of data since the data does not need to be read or numbered from a disk in the internal database format. Knowing that the data is stored in HDFS, storing large datasets of up to hundreds of petabytes of data on Apache Hive is possible. This solution is much more scalable than a traditional database. Knowing that it is a cloud service, Apache Hive allows users to quickly launch virtual servers based on fluctuations in workloads (i.e., tasks). Security is also an aspect where Hive performs better, with its ability to replicate recovery-critical workloads in the event of a problem. Finally, the work capacity is unparalleled since it can perform up to 100,000 requests per hour.
Apache Impala
Apache Impala is a massively parallel SQL query engine for the interactive execution of SQL queries on data stored in Apache Hadoop, written in C++ and distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. Impala is also called an MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) engine, a distributed DBMS, and even a SQL-on-Hadoop stack database. Impala operates in distributed mode, where process instances run on different cluster nodes, receiving, scheduling, and coordinating client requests. In this case, parallel execution of fragments of the SQL query is possible. Impala depends infrastructurally on another popular SQL-on-Hadoop tool, Apache Hive, using its metadata store. In particular, the Hive Metastore lets Impala know about the availability and structure of the databases. When creating, modifying, and deleting schema objects or loading data into tables via SQL statements, the corresponding metadata changes are automatically propagated to all Impala nodes using a specialized directory service. The key components of Impala are the following executables:
How does Apache Impala Work
Impala, like Apache Hive, uses a similar declarative query language, Hive Query Language (HiveQL), which is a subset of SQL92, instead of SQL. The actual execution of the request in Impala is as follows: The client application sends a SQL query by connecting to any impalad through standardized ODBC or JDBC driver interfaces. The connected impalad becomes the coordinator of the current request. The SQL query is analyzed to determine the tasks for the impalad instances in the cluster; then, the optimal query execution plan is built. Impalad directly accesses HDFS and HBase using local instances of system services to provide data. Unlike Apache Hive, such direct interaction significantly saves query execution time, as intermediate results are not saved. In response, each daemon returns data to the coordinating impalad, sending the results back to the client.
Features of Impala
Apache Impala: Benefits
Impala avoids possible startup overhead because all system daemon processes are started directly at boot time. It significantly saves query execution time. An additional increase in the speed of Impala is because this SQL tool for Hadoop, unlike Hive, does not store intermediate results and accesses HDFS or HBase directly. In addition, Impala generates program code at runtime and not at compilation, as Hive does. However, a side effect of Impala’s high-speed performance is reduced reliability. In particular, if the data node goes down during the execution of a SQL query, the Impala instance will restart, and Hive will continue to keep a connection to the data source, providing fault tolerance. Other benefits of Impala include built-in support for a secure network authentication protocol Kerberos, prioritization, and the ability to manage the queue of requests and support for popular Big Data formats such as LZO, Avro, RCFile, Parquet, and Sequence.
Hive Vs Impala: Similarities
Hive and Impala are freely distributed under the Apache Software Foundation license and refer to SQL tools for working with data stored in a Hadoop cluster. In addition, they also use the HDFS distributed file system. Impala and Hive implement different tasks with a common focus on SQL processing of big data stored in an Apache Hadoop cluster. Impala provides a SQL-like interface, allowing you to read and write Hive tables, thus enabling easy data exchange. At the same time, Impala makes SQL operations on Hadoop quite fast and efficient, allowing using this DBMS in Big Data analytics research projects. Whenever possible, Impala works with an existing Apache Hive infrastructure already used to execute long-running SQL batch queries. Also, Impala stores its table definitions in a metastore, a traditional MySQL or PostgreSQL database, i.e., in the same place where Hive stores similar data. It allows Impala to access Hive tables as long as all columns use Impala’s supported data types, file formats, and compression codecs.
Hive Vs Impala: Differences
Programming language
Hive is written in Java, whereas Impala is written in C++. However, Impala also uses some Java-based Hive UDFs.
Use cases
Data Engineers use Hive in ETL processes (Extract, Transform, Load), for example, for long-running batch jobs on large data sets, for example, in travel aggregators and airport information systems. In turn, Impala is intended mainly for analysts and data scientists and is mainly used in tasks like business intelligence.
Performance
Impala executes SQL queries in real-time, while Hive is characterized by low data processing speed. With simple SQL queries, Impala can run 6-69 times faster than Hive. However, Hive handles complex queries better.
Latency/throughput
The throughput of Hive is significantly higher than that of Impala. The LLAP (Live Long and Process) feature, which enables query caching in memory, gives Hive good low-level performance. LLAP includes long-term system services (daemons), which allow you to directly interact with HDFS data nodes and replace the tightly integrated DAG query structure (Directed acyclic graph) – a graph model actively used in Big Data computing.
Fault tolerance
Hive is a fault-tolerant system that preserves all intermediate results. It also positively affects scalability but leads to a decrease in data processing speed. In turn, Impala cannot be called a fault-tolerant platform because it’s more memory bound.
Code conversion
Hive generates query expressions at compile time, while Impala generates them at runtime. Hive is characterized by a “cold start” problem the first time the application is launched; queries are converted slowly due to the need to establish a connection to the data source. Impala does not have this kind of startup overhead. The necessary system services (daemons) for processing SQL queries are started at boot time, which speeds up the work.
Storage support
Impala supports LZO, Avro, and Parquet formats, while Hive works with Plain Text and ORC. However, both support the RCFIle and Sequence formats.
Final Words
Hive and Impala do not compete but rather effectively complement each other. Even though there are significant differences between the two, there is also quite a lot in common and choosing one over the other depends on the data and particular requirements of the project. You may also explore head-to-head comparisons between Hadoop and Spark. .
